Now that the courts have ordered the FEC to
pronounce the fitness or otherwise of the president. That the president’s
health appears to be more perilous that the FEC is making us to believe.
That both the anti and pro Yar’Adua groups are becoming more pugnacious each
day. That OBJ and members of the PDP board of trustees have fallen apart on
Yar’Adua’s issue. That the vice president has been exposed as unassertive
and pusillanimous. That a section of the North wants to sacrifice the
constitution in order to satisfy the PDP’s zoning arrangement. The next few
weeks and months in Nigeria promise to be very interesting. If Nigeria is
able, as it always does, to peacefully navigate itself out of this glaring
political quagmire, goodluck. If however, anything untoward comes out of
it, blame no one but the ‘all knowing’ Ota General.
RUNNING A SICK NATION FROM
A SICK BED: BLAME NO ONE BUT OBASANJO by Dotun Oyeniyi
History, so we all say, has a way of repeating
itself. However, history is only able to repeat itself because
human beings tend to repeat our acts or inactions. History is not
self-made. It is made out of the deeds of human beings. So
when a bad history is repeated, it is either the author of that
history is a gloating sadist, deriving some pleasure out of a bad
situation or an obdurate personality refusing to learn from
previous errors.
Chief Olusegun Obasanjo (OBJ), in spite of how
benevolent fate has been to him, remains an obdurate character;
intolerant of others’ reasoning and probably refusing to learn
from previous errors. The ongoing hullabaloo over the health of
President Yar’Adua and the hopeless situation in which a sick
president, bedridden in an unknown Saudi Hospital; remains
uncompromising in his resolve, to run a sick nation from a sick
bed; the most culpable is OBJ.
Why? Because OBJ imposed President Yar’adua on
all of us, possibly with the best of intentions but the worst of
outcomes, as he is a man that is too obdurate to learn from
history or explore alternative voice of reason, especially if
those voices emanated from quarters he regarded as enemies’.
Let us quickly cast our minds back to 1979.
This same umpire paved the way for Alhaji Shehu Shagari, one of
the least competent of the then five presidential aspirants to
emerge as Nigeria’s president. Though, Shagari’s party, the NPN
appeared larger and more national than others. Certainly more
widespread than its other two closest rivals, Awolowo’s UPN and
Zik’s NPP, both of which remained insular to the West and East
respectively. Nonetheless, the NPN failed to secure the
prescribed 25% of the votes in two-thirds of the 19 states that
Nigeria then had. It had 25% or more in just 12 states, in the 13th
state – Kano, NPN had just 20.38%. FEDECO had worked on the
logical and conventional position that 13 states was the
two-thirds of 19; at least before Chief Richard Akinjide came out
with the incredulous interpretation that two-thirds of 19 was not
13 but 12 and two-thirds states. So intriguing and confusing.
Faced with this naughty issue; the FEDECO chairman – Michael Ani
and the Attorney General, Mr Nnamani were reported to have sought
OBJ’s opinion. His position was reported to be in support of the
new interpretation, thereby allowing Shagari to become a president
by mathematical abracadabra. Had he insisted that FEDECO should
not move the goalpost after the goal had been missed by the NPN,
there would have been an electoral college, as prescribed by the
constitution, and the frenzy of activities aimed towards a
coalition on the part of UPN, NPP and GNPP immediately after the
elections was sure to block Shagari from becoming the president
and Nigeria would have been spared the terrible misgovernance,
profligacy and mismanagement of the Shagari years, which, in my
opinion was the beginning of Nigeria’s contemporary problems.
28 years after, the pendulum of history has
swung 360 degrees to repeat itself, and the same OBJ was back in
the saddle as an umpire who had, yet again, the most important say
on who would succeed him as President. Then out of the blues
emerged, on the back of Obasanjo influence, a Umaru Musa Yar’Adua
– an insipid, vigourless, colourless and uninspiring character
with a reputation for saving money for its state as governor.
Only OBJ and his inner caucus of the PDP were privy to the heart
of a complex political tapestry, woven around OBJ’s obduracy, that
led to the saddling of a sick man with a weak heart, with the
mammoth job of taking charge of a sick nation whose own heart has
been weakened by staggering and widespread corruption at all
levels.
In picking Yar’Adua, Obasanjo was out to
deliver a callous political blow on Abubakar Atiku who had stepped
on Obasanjo’s toes somehow. Atiku was the arrowhead of the PDM
political group of the Late Shehu Musa Yar’Adua. It was partly on
the crest of the PDM group in the PDP that Obasanjo rode to the
presidency. By picking the juniour Yar’Adua, the very last of
PDM’s carpet was being pulled from under Atiku’s feet. Obasanjo
is an obdurate personality who will often gloat over the
misfortunes of his enemies, real and perceived. And he did
exactly to Atiku in Atiku failed to become president. But why
pick Yar’Adua of all potential candidates?
Though the PDP as a party
is a bunch of corrupt politicians and political gangsters with no
known ideals, but there is still a sprinkle of good politicians of
Northern extraction in the its fold, who can do better than
Yar’Adua, but the choice of Yar’Adua was borne out of obduracy –
Obasanjo’s choice is final! It is this same obduracy that led
to the exit of Audu Ogbe as PDP’s chairman. Ogbe’s exit from the
PDP robbed the party of all remnants of decorum, principles,
objectivity, moderation; voice of reason and possible checks on
Obasanjo’s overbearing influence. Ogbe is one of the finest
politicians of this era – disciplined, modest, frank, frugal,
selfless and prudent. As a minister under Shagari, he
distinguished himself by refusing to join the profligate party.
Even the choice of the vice
president still fell completely on Obasanjo’s shoulder and the
reason why he preferred the lacklustre Goodluck Jonathan over
Donald Duke remains opaque. If what we have seen of Jonathan in
the last 30 months is anything to go by; especially his current
mendacious complicity with the federal executive council (FEC)
about the state of the President’s health, he is the other side of
the Yar’adua coin. Those who had taken to the streets and those
who had gone to the courts for a single purpose of forcing common
sense to prevail and get the country running again under Jonathan
have nothing to regret. But those who have thrown down the
gauntlet in the hope that a Goodluck might do better than a Umaru
will end up being thoroughly disappointed.
Now that the courts have ordered the FEC to pronounce the fitness
or otherwise of the president. That the president’s health
appears to be more perilous that the FEC is making us to believe.
That both the anti and pro Yar’Adua groups are becoming more
pugnacious each day. That OBJ and members of the PDP board of
trustees have fallen apart on Yar’Adua’s issue. That the vice
president has been exposed as unassertive and pusillanimous. That
a section of the North wants to sacrifice the constitution in
order to satisfy the PDP’s zoning arrangement. The next few weeks
and months in Nigeria promise to be very interesting. If Nigeria
is able, as it always does, to peacefully navigate itself out of
this glaring political quagmire, goodluck. If however, anything
untoward comes out of it, blame no one but the ‘all knowing’ Ota
General.